52 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
52 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
# Editorial Principles
|
|
|
|
**Status:** RC (Release Candidate)
|
|
**Phase:** The Bedrock Phase
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
These are the editorial rules governing all content in the Open Engineer standard. Every contributor must follow these principles.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 1. Translate. Do Not Transplant.
|
|
|
|
Open Engineer recognizes observations wherever they arise. It translates enduring observations into engineering principles without adopting the surrounding ideology.
|
|
|
|
### What This Means
|
|
|
|
Do not import an entire philosophy, tradition, or framework into Open Engineer. Instead, identify the specific observation that has engineering value, and translate that observation into precise engineering language.
|
|
|
|
### Why This Matters
|
|
|
|
This keeps Open Engineer universal. No tradition is diminished. No tradition is elevated above another. They are acknowledged as independent observers of reality.
|
|
|
|
### Examples
|
|
|
|
| Tradition | Observation | Engineering Translation |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| Taoism | Attachment can obscure perception | An engineer should remain committed to reality above any preferred solution |
|
|
| Stoicism | Distinguish what is within your control from what is not | Separate controllable design variables from environmental constraints |
|
|
| Indigenous stewardship | We inherit responsibilities as well as resources | Engineering artifacts should be created with stewardship and long-term inheritance in mind |
|
|
| Scientific method | Hypotheses must survive testing | Understanding is provisional until verified against reality |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 2. Single Responsibility
|
|
|
|
Every document must have exactly one primary responsibility.
|
|
|
|
A document that defines observation does not define verification. It references verification. This is how standards remain readable.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 3. The Four-Question Framework
|
|
|
|
Every new addition to the standard must answer four questions:
|
|
|
|
1. **Observation?** — What was observed that prompted this?
|
|
2. **Engineering Principle?** — What engineering principle does this express?
|
|
3. **Reasoning?** — What is the reasoning that connects the observation to the principle?
|
|
4. **Relationship to Existing Concepts?** — How does this relate to what already exists?
|
|
|
|
Nothing enters Bedrock without surviving those four layers. |