62 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
Executable File
62 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
Executable File
# OE-0004: Observation
|
|
|
|
**Status:** Draft
|
|
**Version:** 0.2.0-draft
|
|
**Depends on:** OE-0003 (Engineering Context)
|
|
**Phase:** The Bedrock Phase
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
Observation is the primary input to the engineering process. Before any principle can be established, before any decision can be made, there must first be observation.
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
An observation is a verifiable encounter with reality.
|
|
|
|
## Taxonomy of Observations
|
|
|
|
Not all observations enter the engineering process through the same path. Open Engineer distinguishes two categories:
|
|
|
|
### Direct Observation
|
|
|
|
A measurement, experiment, or empirical encounter with physical reality conducted by the practitioner or their team. Direct observations are the primary input to engineering decisions.
|
|
|
|
Examples: load test results, material strength measurements, system performance benchmarks, field inspections.
|
|
|
|
### Corroborated Observation
|
|
|
|
An observation reported by a source outside direct engineering practice that has been independently confirmed by engineering evidence or by independent confirmation across multiple traditions or domains.
|
|
|
|
Corroborated observations are valid inputs when the underlying observation has withstood testing from independent sources. The standard does not accept them on authority — it accepts them on the basis of independent corroboration.
|
|
|
|
Examples of corroboration:
|
|
|
|
| Reported Observation | Independent Engineering Confirmation |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| Distinguish controllable from uncontrollable factors (multiple traditions) | Control theory, stress engineering, decision theory — all independently arrived at this distinction |
|
|
| Attachment to preferred solutions distorts judgment (multiple traditions) | Cognitive bias research, engineering failure analysis — both confirm this pattern |
|
|
| Hypotheses must survive testing (scientific method) | Every engineering verification methodology confirms this |
|
|
|
|
## The Principle of Observation First
|
|
|
|
Observe first. Before theorizing. Before abstracting. Before generalizing. The practitioner must first identify what has been observed — directly or through corroboration — and record it as it is, not as expected or desired.
|
|
|
|
This is the first step in the Open Engineer process:
|
|
|
|
1. Observe first.
|
|
2. Recognize patterns.
|
|
3. Translate into engineering language.
|
|
4. Verify against reality.
|
|
5. Preserve the resulting understanding.
|
|
|
|
## Observation as Foundation
|
|
|
|
No later specification document may redefine what observation means. Only extend it. Observation is bedrock.
|
|
|
|
## Single Responsibility
|
|
|
|
This document defines observation and its taxonomy. It does not define verification (see OE-0007) or translation (see `reference/editorial-principles.md`). It references them.
|
|
|
|
## Applicable Laws
|
|
|
|
This document is governed by all Engineering Laws defined in `laws/engineering-laws.md`. |